collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 578 Indian land  (Read 4690 times)

Offline Shooter4

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 521
  • Location: spokane
  • Groups: kuiu
578 Indian land
« on: November 12, 2024, 12:42:50 PM »
Everybody should be in tune with what’s going on in 578 with the Yakima tribe trying to take over the majority of this unit voices need to be heard and or some type of presence.

Offline Shooter4

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 521
  • Location: spokane
  • Groups: kuiu
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2024, 12:44:44 PM »
I’m sorry but all we have been doing for these tribes is give give give when will it be enough?

Offline dreamingbig

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 2819
  • Location: Mukilteo, WA
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #2 on: November 12, 2024, 01:25:14 PM »
What is going on?  Fill us in!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@mukbowhunt
Avid Bowhunter
Maxxis 35 / Trykon XL

Offline Shooter4

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 521
  • Location: spokane
  • Groups: kuiu
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #3 on: November 12, 2024, 02:57:16 PM »
Apparently a treaty got “dug up” claiming they own half of 578 decisions are made soon which would in turn mean damn near half of 578 will be Yakima tribe land

Offline HntnFsh

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 6396
  • Location: Toledo
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #4 on: November 12, 2024, 03:00:05 PM »
Is this part of what already happened down by Goldendale?

Offline Shooter4

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 521
  • Location: spokane
  • Groups: kuiu
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #5 on: November 12, 2024, 03:25:45 PM »
Is this part of what already happened down by Goldendale?
still transpiring

Offline Mtnwalker

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2015
  • Posts: 2389
  • Location: Selah
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #6 on: November 12, 2024, 03:42:28 PM »
If you're going to start a thread on this it would be nice if you could include some actual information. I was under the impression this was decided by the Supreme Court a couple years back...

Offline HntnFsh

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 6396
  • Location: Toledo
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #7 on: November 12, 2024, 03:45:22 PM »
 :yeah:

Offline Shooter4

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 521
  • Location: spokane
  • Groups: kuiu
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #8 on: November 12, 2024, 04:05:08 PM »
It is still in Supreme Court final decisions are being made within the next couple months

Offline Shooter4

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 521
  • Location: spokane
  • Groups: kuiu
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #9 on: November 12, 2024, 04:09:36 PM »
All this should have been a done deal back in the '60s,That dispute was settled and I think $2.1 million was given to the tribe to relinquish all rights to what we refer to as Tract D, which takes in Glenwood, and so they accepted the money, ceded all rights to it.

Offline JakeLand

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (+35)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 4573
  • Location: Wet side
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #10 on: November 12, 2024, 05:26:35 PM »
All this should have been a done deal back in the '60s,That dispute was settled and I think $2.1 million was given to the tribe to relinquish all rights to what we refer to as Tract D, which takes in Glenwood, and so they accepted the money, ceded all rights to it.
then if it was sold with legal documents then it’s a closed door right ?

Offline millerwheeler

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 1512
  • Location: Spanaway
  • Get out and put some miles on those boots
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #11 on: November 12, 2024, 05:42:47 PM »
Voices will do nothing it’s probably too far gone. As said we have given and given.  We will see ruling soon as stated

Offline Magnum_Willys

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 5615
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #12 on: November 12, 2024, 07:58:02 PM »
Old news.  Glenwood and a bunch of 578 is Reservation.  Expect a lot of State land and the Conboy unit to be transferred too.

Some water to Glenwood Ranches have already been shut off.  You need a Res permit to draw water.

https://www.goldendalesentinel.com/news/tract-d-is-yakama-land-u-s-supreme-court-rules/article_427ccbac-c0d3-11ec-8a06-4b1c1d26dea2.html

I own 80 acres 1/2 on res land.   No surprise. 

Offline HntnFsh

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 6396
  • Location: Toledo
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #13 on: November 13, 2024, 05:41:23 AM »
Said Goldendale on my previous post. Meant Glenwood.
« Last Edit: November 13, 2024, 07:17:01 AM by HntnFsh »

Offline Shooter4

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 521
  • Location: spokane
  • Groups: kuiu
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #14 on: November 13, 2024, 07:14:57 AM »
Old news.  Glenwood and a bunch of 578 is Reservation.  Expect a lot of State land and the Conboy unit to be transferred too.

Some water to Glenwood Ranches have already been shut off.  You need a Res permit to draw water.

https://www.goldendalesentinel.com/news/tract-d-is-yakama-land-u-s-supreme-court-rules/article_427ccbac-c0d3-11ec-8a06-4b1c1d26dea2.html

I own 80 acres 1/2 on res land.   No surprise.
grandparents live there I’m hearing it potentially will require a res tag to hunt but if conboy gets sucked in that elk herd will be decimated
 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Desert unit 290 October buck hunt by redi
[Today at 04:30:31 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by scottfrick
[Yesterday at 11:00:44 PM]


Anyone use game carts? by TitusFord
[Yesterday at 09:57:59 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by Seabass
[Yesterday at 09:46:33 PM]


FS Surbu BFG 50 by metlhead
[Yesterday at 09:14:18 PM]


Hancock/Manulife........No Trespassing signs everywhere! What's the deal. by hunter399
[Yesterday at 09:02:11 PM]


Share your out of state experience by Alan K
[Yesterday at 08:58:56 PM]


East Side by metlhead
[Yesterday at 08:56:20 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by Big6bull
[Yesterday at 08:50:37 PM]


Hunting w/ 30 rd magazine by Fidelk
[Yesterday at 07:32:22 PM]


Weyerhauser: St Helens - inscrutable? by ljsommer
[Yesterday at 07:28:25 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 06:22:40 PM]


Interview of Greg Jones about wolves by deer_hnter
[Yesterday at 04:54:26 PM]


Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal by Houndhunter
[Yesterday at 04:00:31 PM]


Flynn’s 1st rooster!!! by Forrestrover
[Yesterday at 11:11:07 AM]


Winthrop - Winter Range Road Closures by no.cen.wa
[Yesterday at 11:00:20 AM]


NAVY BEAN SOUP by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 10:50:59 AM]


Rabbit guts, feet heads for trapping bait by HighlandLofts
[Yesterday at 10:18:53 AM]


As He Lay by ganghis
[Yesterday at 09:28:02 AM]


Piebald blacktail fawn by highside74
[Yesterday at 09:26:27 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal